The irreversibility of time (...) 6

The irreversibility of time (...) 6

The perspective of time this unknown who will succeed in us the living, with all the hustle and bustle of day-to-day, yesterday we were children, now adults this circumspection of asking us mind that it will be after the end of earthly life, which It will be our subsequent destination, because the end never process (...) this worldly life is like an ante-chamber while the metamorphosis of this life does not occur.
However I will tell a conversation that will serve as an example for case in point: I went to social security in Almada, in order to get a copy of the order on a process that requested legal protection, while I wait, sat next to me a man I did not know, greeted me warmly as if I had already known, as I am of easy care, we maintained a conversation, he told me also had an issue to deal with.
Then came we speak of life, he said, exact words: "We came to this world naked and also took nothing." We talked a given step in our conversation that the dead are cremated, and that people watch the cremation of the remains, then pointed out that a neighbor of yours who are migrants in France, has a son who was born there and that in conversation with He said working in a funeral in France and that his job is to rebuild the faces of people who die who are disfigured when the accidents, he also said he wanted to stay in Portugal to work in this area.
Human destiny is not to explain so "linearly" and talking of "immortality" is necessary to have as premises these two figures of science, a doctor, and another philosopher, because also as a science by its strong contribution in the field of logic, philosophy of language, philosophy of mathematics and philosophy of mind. we must be based on some preliminary ranging described below as scientific proof either case forward as follows.
It is pertinent to this thesis of Wittgenstein philosopher, has a non-theological vision of eternal life, it says sic "If we do not define eternity as infinite ie temporal duration but timelessness (unquote) well just corroborate with this statement so just took the excerpt from the same context in which I agree. It could also fail to enumerate this tremendous truth to quote Wikipedia (this great free encyclopedia) Sic "There is a fascination with humanity, at least since the beginning of history . The Epic of Gilgamesh, one of the first literary works, dating back to the mid-twenty-second century BC, is essentially the search for a hero for immortality "(unquote).
According to Leonard Hayflick, the American doctor's Anatomy professor at the University of California, he studied the aging process. For reference I quote. "Hayflick studied the aging process for over thirty years and has made important discoveries about cellular senescence and telomere shortening According to Leonard Hayflick cells have a certain time to die, the lifetime of which is according to the size of telomeres, if telomeres get too shorten the cell dies, the shortening of telomeres limit became known as the Hayflick limit. "(unquote)
As a support to my theme, it became much more plausible as these two figures mentioned above the Austrian philosopher Wittgenstein, one of the most important philosophers of Sec. XX and the doctor Hayflick give reputation it needed to my speech, more technical on the one hand the professor of anatomy.
Perhaps he would wonder why quote the professor of anatomy, anxiety and fascination the urge to live, and this professor has studied the aging of cells, just to prolong life, human desire to live.
As for the philosopher Wittgenstein formulated questions and answered them because it has a theological vision of eternal life, even to refute the assertion of what is temporal and timeless, so I thought as appropriate and also because tiller the same position.
Now it is about the "immortality" that in the course of my speech I try to be consistent and I refer to in the first paragraph.
This conception is not "deadly" but "immortal", immortality is a philosophy as mortals, are matter and therefore subject to "perish".
The question that arises is whether we living will or not this "status" of immortality ?! Or will occur within us this belief fueled by the spirit to persist and to converge in this theological field acquiring this "armor" as a protection and aware that we held in the metamorphosis of life as stated ago ?.
My discussion is marked out between the metamorphosis that will occur for this state "immortal" and all earthly living situation as "sine qua non".
It is my perception, so my truth, which is not true of all! Everything ends in life (...) but there is a continuity that want to exist and persist in it and there are many empty well that my speech did not let go unharmed.
But it should be noted that for many "is an aberration" because the chain of these controversial issues raise discussion, plurality, consistency, subjection. And note that the various philosophers authors I've read, a particular condition found in most, if not the great overwhelming majority of them, are respectful toward each other and there is a marriage of some ideas with others, and convergence on key points , that's why admirers of each others were followers of these ideas notablizaram the Universal World of Letters, Philosophy, History, etc. However there were also some problematic philosophers that I am remembering some, but I will not mention names.
And to reinforce what I say and hold any discussion because I believe in knowledge of those authors who have always been the time to converge on an essential point and because differ from the perception of a "nuclear vision" to bring light to discuss and refute certain point of view where the logical and rational chain greatly contributed to the knowledge of the world around us, but it was always around my theme I conducted my speech about the "immortality" which is exacerbated long? No !, "immortality is immortality." António Cardoso.