"Conscious and subconscious" (...)

Our speech obtained his clarity and conviction that our partners will understand the context of everything we have said.

Because the consistency of our claims being sometimes insipid, because we use irony, but has passed our speech with this appetite to wear the ideas with a garment that gives us a certain literary pleasure.

What we say this ironically exacerbated in a context making presumed pragmatism of some absolute truth, has been our speech show that the guidelines which we contend are credible because the truth of literature assimilated by these considerations are evident.

Although synthetic and telegraphic form are made relevant considerations have conquered our interlocutors the audience that these issues deserve.

It's been our "style", smooth and light on context, but more focused on the ideals to retain.

But going specifically to our subject that is conscious subconscious to refer to this as the conscious dominates all the sensations to the most disparate

While the subconscious with the conscious conveys these feelings because this is the decision maker, for example: The subconscious notes that it is cold (...), this feeling is transmitted to the conscious materialize with their decision, or more clothing, or putting a heater (...).

That is why the conscious being active is the executor of these sensations, the conscious identifies the "sense of state", for example, be sad or glad, happy or unhappy, being tired or hungry, feeling cold, or heat, be pleasant or uncomfortable, after all these states are transmitted to the conscious knowledge of all sensitive situations occurring.

Conscious also given the emotions that demystifies by reducing, to the address given you coverage and remedying situations.

Unlike the subconscious mind which eventually receives welcome emissions and saves, crystallizing these issues, which may mean failure by the extent of impairment, by being passive.

It seems to be utopian to extrapolate these reflections, but admit that our subconscious mind receives the "feeling or sensation" X what it takes to solve.

And what is the solution? As has been explained throughout our speech to be conscious decision maker, it all makes and fulfills what is within reach.

The opposite has occurred with the subconscious that does not give solution, and stores all the information of mind, their status is passive, as we have seen in previous excerpts.

For this reason, in view of our speech, while maintaining the same consistency implies:
The conscious is active and is decision maker? Yes, this question is yes.

The subconscious is passive? Yes, it is so, it stores all the information, waiting for the decision maker who is the Aware.

With these answers we thought we interact positively and do not move away from our speech standing in line so far, we believe to be the face to the contributions of our reading in this field.

So our discourse will continue to infer questions for which we know the answers, as well as its consistency, although synthetic and yet telegraph, but always support this belief to be our conscious and subconscious theme. António Cardoso