"The irreversibility of time" (...) 16

Developing our discourse we always try to follow the theme and go into it and let yourself be carried away by the fact that is visible especially if we consider that to explain something (...) what happens to us, our partners will perceive is indeed the story or fiction, or some particular aspect is consistency in relation to the subject in which we refer.

But if our subject is the "irreversibility of time," it certainly will walk around this theme and the inevitable perceptions brought the discussion will be in symbiosis contributing to clarify the situations that occur.

It is no coincidence that the focus on certain aspect, is not already in our imagination chaining the line that if you want to take, and have to always take our discourse perspective we want to go, or leave a message or some considerations.

It is in the writing course that our thinking runs smoothly, not leaving disguise, because they did not want to contradict, or deceive.

Because the following paragraphs are the irrefutable proof what we said is true or not.
Certainly from the point of view that we want to stress is a fiction we have to tell and have a more consistent and noticeable content.

But it is precisely in fiction that large plots of passion and tragedy, narratives and descriptions, true or not, unusual, etc., that's how come the great masterpieces of the world literature does not forget because they are already immortalized in "time", making part of the great cultural and universal acquis.

Because after the "irreversibility of time", a constant that goes back to generations.

So this is our contemporary time, as it is today, we will be reporting it.

Now the contemporary is as we know, are our days, those who live, however, the authors of past centuries were contemporaries of other authors of that time, in the lacto sense because universally all belong to the same world, only because they lived in diferents periods, obviously, our world, our planet Earth, a World without borders for which these authors have contributed so much.

Conditioned by "this" irreversibility "the overwhelming majority of authors from various fields of knowledge, they left unfinished works and continued by his successors others, because the void they leave these" luminaries of intelligence "is relevant.

To the point that, as the authors if you can not get indeferente there is something which needs to be continued (...) of their work.

To put such fallibility is a fact (...) are the authors who have been with the estate and are the followers (...). As we have seen in the life of every human being, it is imperative this "irreversibility" we have to deal with it in our lifetimes (...) because the unpredictability of "lifetime" is crucial.

It's like a "wire to catch the skein" where the tip to unwind is starting point of the work started by another author, very important is to follow the reasoning of his mentor (...), it takes work, it is necessary that the work is in the same direction line so as not to detract from work.

Usually tends to be the continuer of the work, a disciple, who is of the same author's knowledge of the area, who was his friend, or even an admirer who fell in love for the work.

There are still other authors who are in the same line of thought (...) and that the principles expounded by the published works give comfortability to the themes, then follow the author with the goal of its value and interest.

Indeed, how ephemeral life on earth, and even exhaustive permanence of man on earth, undoubtedly has what we call the "irreversibility of time," and after which the "time" of this (...) finished. there is continuity of its work by other authors, is a duty mankind, not for stagnation, but for the knowledge that concerns everyone this relidade that are our lives, stating that the "irreversibility condition to which we are subjected, as the "time" this "giant" does not stop and consequently continues its way. Antonio Cardoso