"The irreversibility of time" (...) 19

Our discourse follows the route by which led to the conviction of trying to persuade our partners, because the topic is complex, the "irreversibility of time."

More complex becomes if not touched on the main lines of our speech, or omit some key aspect.

But if indeed our speech is convinced discover the manner in which the body is of a mask that is inside does not let see, nor his imaginary countenance never describe.

What is behind this mask that covers our body?

What is behind it?

The previous questions reinforce the anxiety, in fact, we have conducted our discourse to convince our interlocutors that the "complexity" still "ruling" in the universe of the overwhelming majority of those who do not see themselves in our convictions.

Because, "these convictions still insipid, if not inconsistent, think those parties that do not see themselves in it.

Certainly never be in tune with our speech, but the curiosity of the subsequent issues will read excerpts from our trying to understand at last that "mask is, and what is behind it?

It is a icógnita a question ?! for which our interlocutors want answers.

Talk about these questions and this straightforwardness, we confess that there are few that can extrapolate, "without pregaminhos" especially the inaccessibility and secrecy that contain these discussions by the imperative of this "irreversibility of time."

We do not want to instill our truth, because only just be ours, but "your truth" for us is the most important for the diversity of opinions and points of convergence.

But if the "beliefs" come from within, in our heart, and feel like a supernatural force that speaks to us internally, it behooves us to know whether the "earthly life" as this is ephemeral, and if such a passage to another life we call "metamorphosis" if you have for granted? We reformulate the question and answer in the affirmative.

Yes we maintain our consistency in our previous speeches, it would be imprudent for humanity, live perceive after all the subsequent fate (...) of our "earthly life".

Take us to mock what follows will described:

Live to live, after the "earthly life". Ends all! Some say interlocutors!. There is no passage to another life, there is nothing.

We are the saddest of this world ?!

That Fatality!

The conviction we have that "imperfection" in humans that determines the resulting consequences overshadows the "sublime knowledge" of this ephemeral stay in this "earthly life". That is, the prefeccionismo "does not exist" is an aberration, this term is not for humans (...), the supposed protagonist who dare have is pure pretensionismo.

Given the inadequate behavior of our ancestors, connected with a pejorative which greatly decreases in particular the harm, betrayals, murders, and also by the prevailing sadism and ailing humanity.

Mankind has strengths and weaknesses. Since the defects are more apparent, so the "imperfection", as we said is "latent is a dormant state.

We do not ignore the evil that humanity against humanity have dealt fatal blows that much have denigrated the sound and harmonious coexistence.

For this reason. our speech, "dissatisfied" with human behavior, has touched upon the conviction that this life is as an "antechamber". We have said "similar phrase" in another context, we have used the same term.

That's right, this world we live in is like a "ante-chamber", as if a preliminary, to rehearse and "play beautifully run."

And so the need for a reminder to our partners that our discourse or praise with only two points:

1. The disagreement of what this world, uneven, sad, tragic, treacherous and nostalgic, though with some joyful and hilarious moments, to disguise.

2. By the conviction that there must be compensation for this current world, served as "World-School" to learn that human evil exists and is still "dormant".

Finally to strengthen our speech that sometimes we account that all is well and try to philosophize in the contexts we refer to in our speeches. Always follow this emphasis because it is our theme the "irreversibility of time" that sustains our speech. António Cardoso