"The irreversibility of time" (...) 320

The instant is an infinite quantity circumscribed in time, yet this validity of the "temporal instant" is predominant.

For it is in an instant that one acquires life in his "specific conception," on the one hand.

On the other hand, it also loses itself irreversibly in "a given moment", characterized by the unpredictable unpredictability of life (...).

Under this infallible presupposition, it is significant that after all time marks a certain time from instant to instant, which will be that time which translates as time of earthly permanence, as the physical existence of "someone" in this present global space.

This inevitability of living only a "material life" what happens to humanity, because it lives aware of this material condition that is imposed because it is so constructed in a perishable material body.

In fact, living is an imperative that mankind subsists from generation to generation of this fact, in view of its underlying civilization that underlies it in its generality that makes it submissive and vulnerable a predestination inculcated in time to live the present "material life" .

As material physical existence, the material dependence which mankind constitutes this essence, and which becomes the basis of its own intrinsic existence, the human species, is unmoved.

The existence of man and woman is affirmed by the essence of their nature, represented as such, either to man or woman, one and the other meshed in a single "mold", which gives them body, and to life that configures them with characteristics X And Y, however, equal in "conceptional genesis," but different, indivisible, and unique.

To this greatness of the human species is called individual, man or woman, evidently, currently immersed in the same global space where we live.

However, marked by the contingency of time that absorbs this "temporal space", as a "non-durable credit" that is granted to "someone", which translates as "permanence of life time" a validity in temporal space that may Be long or not.

What does it mean to say that it is relative, the lifetime of "someone," if we take into account that it is variable from person to person.

For the desirable thing is the longevity characterized by the "thirsty thirst" for living to which humans have seemed to us to be unanimous.

The will for life is legitimate and ardently manifested in humanity, an inexplicable phenomenon, the "pleasure for life", constitutes its "enigma" of the happiness that one will have or not in the world in which we live.

So in the context of this self-revelation, in a general way in which all men and women are reviewed, by the multiplicity of benefits, that life encloses, since "to live" means to give and to receive, to learn to understand how great this thorny "Task of living".

One does not live irresponsibly, the flavor of life is something indecipherable, an unprecedented latitude and comprehensiveness a "unique gift" for which one does not live "twice", a pragmatism that reaches its peak in "love of wisdom."

Because it is diametrically opposed to the material world, which is ours, to "know" the "meanders" of a supernatural reality of which the human species is also composed:

On the one hand, mankind is formed organically by perishable body-matter, subject to the laws of nature, and its degradation as a material body is a fact, which happens to humans.

On the other hand, it is still composed of soul, spirit, being this supernatural side, therefore it is not degradable and for which little or nothing is known about it.

Precisely, by the "inaccessibility" of his knowledge, that will remain ... that is obscurantism.

So in the expectation that we can leave some more considerations on the subject of the "irreversibility of time," we did so. António Cardoso