"The irreversibility of time (...) 333

In the life and in the time in which we live, in which a whole experience is gained by the practical obtaining exercised in the time (...), the similarity of a "test", to have that faculty to modify certain course.

In fact, it can mean to do better, especially by the experience already acquired, which will prove that a certain existential phenomenon implicit to mankind, can be contradicted.

Especially if one has the opportunity, given the experience one has, of the practical utility already "lived" to certify this concrete existence, and can do the best, it is certainly within the reach of the experience already obtained.
  
There are circumstances that occur at a given moment, in the face of the clutter of situations, that it is necessary to be able to remove and neutralize something that ... supposedly embarrassing and harmful, given that given a certain experience it is possible to modify.

These circumstances were at the origin with the implications of a life full of various contradictions, characterized by a daily life that was aborted at the right time, something that could have other consequences.

In which the view on a given experience made presume the continuity, but faced with the empirical knowledge of some differences and asymmetries in the scope of diverse relations, namely social, work or friendship were interrupted because it was the best solution.

Thus, the experience of something (...), relatively to evaluate the current conjuncture, the imperatives of a society with a high ethical dimension, the similarities were visible and the equality of the relations were identical as previous moments, however there was a sudden change, a another model.

Because the new paradigm was a model diametrically opposed to our purposes and conviction, although our empirical knowledge pointed to the change of "paradigm" that occurred.

And what seemed similar, namely that healthy experience of one with another, some inequalities followed by unpleasant situations.

Certain difficulties that have been overcome, as well as the similarities because they are connected with the existence of a connection or some affinity, have remained because they were sincere if they remained faithful, in the face of our experience, on the one hand.

On the other hand, the differences are clear because there is a characteristic, a peculiar trait that identifies some inequality, the expressed perception leaves no doubt, although similar is indeed different.

So we conclude that an important point is to live from experience, to start with a range of solutions to unforeseeable situations, however, "unpredictability" is in itself an abstract and unequal reference is never taken for granted, especially since the contingency is different As well as its detail.


In the expectation that our speech may leave some more considerations on the subject on the "irreversibility of time". António Cardoso