"Conscious and subconscious" (...)

The conscious and the subconscious are interconnected, there is a bond in which the conscious has the receptor function by inducing the mind of the impulses it receives, as the subconscious another dimension because underlies the conscious, knows the issues and perceives all adversity but without giving any solution.

Are two specific states, the conscious and the subconscious, as we have said in previous excerpts, the former has an effective action is the direct collaborator of the mind, the second face, his passivity, collects all the information retained for later saving in However it should be noted that you always have the perception of situations that have occurred and details that were derived.


Conscious has a close relationship with the mind, indeed has been the virtual concept of dependence of each other for complicity denoting.

The orders come from the mind to be materialized by the conscious, the subconscious registers and wait, witnesses the work of conscious and review the position of the mind, as if it were a "chart", and the mind is at the top, of course.

The subconscious is an adviser to the conscious but passive quality that is intrinsic to him. It does its work "always in tow" conscious.

The question of mind, even today, there is much to explain many situations, perceptions, clinical trials, medical theses of the most comprehensive detail, a certainty we have: The questions are case to case, but there is a general behavior that leads to induce the perception of a given disease (...)

That's how doctors, clinical psychologists, psychiatrists have said and thought to be clear evidence that all these physicians in their dental disorders have reiterated all these statements (...).

There are other issues of the mind connected with the sacred and the profane, rarely, convergence is not peaceful places to salutary question paraphrase: Jesus of Nazareth, "Give to Caesar what is Caesar's and to God what is God's."

It does not seem to make much sense to bring this great "buzzword", but taking into account one speak of "Sacred". So everything changes, he is the protagonist of all time, we inevitably talk about it, even if we do not want. He is the author of these words. To simplify: "Each thing in its place."

Now desmitificadas everything you just heard, certainly better understand our reach. As for the profane humanity has a "word" on the subject, so we keep our silence.

Continuing our theme conscious and subconscious, is complex affirm the multiplicity of various currents of opinion: however is standard being permeable to sound and harmonious discussion as religious denominations, or not, because all have a place in society where the "word" has been welcomed by its believers, though different from one and other.
But the plurality of these confessions, with a tolerance that each seek your leadership.

We are not far from the truth, it's healthy to say that there are distances that separate them. There is a common denominator in all of them and ecumenism has taken relevant steps to that balance.

In addition, however, a concern of "ancient times" the "salvific plan" in which nations, kings, peoples, societies confronted with this reality.

The truth is that took place many centuries and centuries, our adopt time count, the Gregorian calendar in which establishes an AD identification acronym BC and DC, then.

But we continue to infer relevant concerns to say that the "saving plan" exists, but we will not get into those details. Because it is not our intention to enter for this "path", not compromise, in fact our interlocutors are not predisposed to this discussion.

Continue, but with our conscious and subconscious theme for us to say after all that goes with this greatness that goes inside us, each indistinctly person is in possession of this unique condition, the particular person but plural for humanity that it is involved because it is the conscious and subconscious with respect to each of us.

Conscious filters everything that gets the mind and induces us to good and refrain from evil, is a born peacemaker, because they always have the "last word" for what we decide. Turns out it's always him to warn us in this way, he says: "My experience is this, he ought not to do this or that I do not agree" (end of quote). But that happens and we have not given you ears and made the "wrong" deliberately.

It is controversial enter the conscious for us to extract his wisdom, or the appropriate advice to the matter at hand. is not exhaustive, because the evil overshadows the truth, so the contours are different: our pride, revenge or not, arrogance, harm, revenge, convenience, etc., is all inferred in our decision, how often we chose "bad".

The conscious is the director par excellence provides the pros and cons. Its position is the best, but gradually realized its importância.assim our speech sought to bring to light more perceptions that are inherent to our conscious and subconscious. António Cardoso