"Conscious and subconscious" (...)

The conscious and subconscious these two leaders whose protagonist is well known, the description, weight, each has a duty to observe, removing the benefits or consequences for subsequent decision.

Conscious never decide without first to have a conviction that were seized all situations, choosing between better and less penalizing for your protagonist.

Indeed to reinforce what we have said, it is true because we all have "our conscious" and mentioned that "inner voice" that is itself conscious approving or not, the good and bad actions in place.

It is based on this assumption, because this 'inner voice', we proved to be a fact, we call conscious, which is inseparable from the human being, as he will live forever.

In the lives of those actions that the conscious does is infallible for good and for bad, this dichotomy person and conscious, in fact is due mainly because the "evil" all of it purposeful in the widespread scope of damage aiming to harm their victims.

So conscious is the first to deny their involvement, and not approve, and the "voice that I mean" already decrypted by the conscious is because he also does not approve.

However, given the "free will" of the protagonist in question, again conscious says: "Look I do not approve, but if you want to (...)", you will have its consequences.

It has always been so and it will be because this "mysterious" conscious, which is our theme, is shrewd and cunning, is benevolent and sadist, is disingenuous and sincere, in short, it is basically the current situation to which we are all subjected.

That is why the conscious decides "a posteriori", based on the experience of this effect, the conscious is faithful to himself, is not deceived or fooled because it is cognizant of the great universe of situations, it is the first to approve or do not.

The conscious and the subconscious, are aware of the good prospects of gross determined action against its "status" does not intrude or against, not in favor, expects the protagonist takes his plan.

Conscious usually always works within itself, that is, at its core to raise the action you want (...), may or may not be feasible.

The conscious, serves as an example for good, it is the default, the one who is always right in your space, as we have noted in other our excerpts, that space is "narrow" and "narrow" should be the other way, to fit all.

Since the "evil" is easier to practice, being a free and open large door on the right is "narrow" and tight space, it is ironic, but it is reality.

So towards more "lacto" for being "narrow" it is that it is difficult for the large universe of people to find the actions and acts their well-being.

In order to understand this greatness that is conscious of its decision established a metaphor:

If an action is good, there is a light that gives approval signal if lighting it, if the action is bad, it gives intermittent signal, turning off then.

This sensory effect is symptomatic that behind or better at the heart of consciousness, there is something of a "fairness" unprecedented, and reason and the right are in symbiosis, sometimes the opposite happens face the idiosyncrasy of its protagonists.

Our aware of the direction to take speech, with reference to our conscious and subconscious theme sought to make more of these considerations. Antonio Cardoso