"Conscious and subconscious" (...)

Conscious is a property that relates to person X in particular, because every one of us is possessed of conscious and subconscious.

The conscious and the subconscious as said above that are autonomous, however, seems utopian most is how we understand because each has its specific task.

The mind that interferes directly to the conscious to absorb with all the work it takes you to do.

Conscious does nothing deliberately have to be expressed in the mind order, usually by impulses, messages, or stimuli, etc.

The conscious and the subconscious exist as a world "apart" and "virtual", for example we can extrapolate as we have done, put one another talking, conjecture, or perceive, "feelings."

It's because (...). You can not take the conscious, it is abstract, it is known that there is (...), as humans, we live but to extrapolate to know what specifically is going on (...) in "our world". But, the mind, the conscious and the subconscious is a world that no one ever came (...). There perceptions!

We have said that is "sublime", because that is what we consider, we will never achieve the imperatives by which underpin the philosophy that we employ always "subtle and biting"

It is incessant perceive something inexplicable (...), but we feel that this ultimate interior existence, and she talked and we want more and more (...) to know. Still perceptions.

We do not intend to contradict, it would be unrealistic if we did, we will maintain strongly that the conscious is so important in our theme. That is not scientific or historical, etc.


Again we insist that the fact that we talk about this "sting" and "subtlety" uninhibited from prejudice, leads us to believe it was worth our thinking be limited in this aspect, because we also want to know (...).

Scientifically, to speak of what is proven and literature corroborates this basis, it is now more than ever at the mercy of a "click", and we can not escape reality.

 But is this life (...) with many questions, the mind, the conscious and the subconscious, these abstract realities (...) because for us is, we can not take in mind, the conscious and the subconscious.

The concrete we know, we touch, we got finally (...), but what we have said above is another "world", and because there is a limitation (...), it reaches a certain point (...) and ends, eg our physical existence.

Hence our speech has no place in this ambiguity because it does not continue. What would curial is science to be exhaustive and absolute (...). And it's not.

It is subject to our existence, that is, as he will live the medicine will solve (...) and after (...), so our philosophy is based on this assumption.

It takes mentality and not divagarmos on the subject, is supernatural this perception we are proud to perceive.

There is talk of X and Y patients who were left with sequelae, and disability are cases and cases. However there is a universe of people who lost consciousness for several situations, some affected by the disease is irreversible, and others with the disease continues culminating in loss of these valences, etc.

You shoot "a stone to the pond" that our speech "careless" to anyone who reads it, the more it is free because it is the uninhibited approach to matters with conscious and subconscious mind, always said and reaffirm that we are "controversial".

Ms continuing our discourse seek to follow the same direction of our conscious and subconscious theme. António Cardoso