"The irreversibility of time (...) 73

It is natural that time whose centrality includes within its scope humanity and the individual whose domain has on them, for it is "timeless" that remains, "there always."

Mankind has always sought an ally and through it establish a lifestyle that particular individual need above all the vision it has on the world around him.

In time, the individual finally integrates and discovers that his inclination to certain work begins to shape and advance in order to obtain knowledge.

Which translates to provide you your admission to certain working area where you want to be directly linked.

But it's about time and its surroundings we report to assert that the "moment" in which we live is special for being the "now", the present and the matter put up tomorrow and turn to ask us after all, what is the time?!

So it is to say, in the same manner and reasons, which remains constantly updated this "greatness" is real because we feel: conjecture, perceive, digress, etc.

We can also say, yet with reluctance that "time" is a representation of "fictional" whose behavior closes the intricacies of "quantum physics" and "cosmology", yet not we stop this argument to infer that the "time" exists fact that.

However, you can not "crawl" its bases, its foundation, which is' !. We already say several times in our previous excerpts that it is "inaccessible" and "unchangeable", it is "ubiquitous". All these adjectives already use in our previous speeches.

We do not intend to exhaust this "theme", because he himself is "inexhaustible" (...), so many inferences made about it, and there is always "much more" to say, to contextualize our speeches.

In fact we do not have this "presumption" of wanting to sketch any discussion of "time", the contributions which have become blurred over the "time", a dozen centuries ago there was much talk (...) over time.

But even at present is to continue to talk about it, and what we know today, are the various contributions of physicists, mathematicians, philosophers, thinkers, historians, etc., on this matter.

Time has absorbed the "minds" more enlightened as a way to unravel, and complex task (...) for a number of contradictions.

Note that the balance and the weight have led to "safe harbor" these discussions, the convergence of some personalities on this topic that has maintained the "status quo".

The question that arises is "transcendental", arising from the same time the progress of technology and scientific knowledge currently at the mercy as a whole.

The time face the "grandfathering" of humanity continues to be the "secret", because if time is irreversible, is to say that he is "self-consuming", to make it irreversible.

Our perception is that while "live" incorporated into the body-matter is extinguished, having exhausted the residence time of "earthly life"

 This time "earthly life", refers to our time in particular, the present, so a 'material time, "logically body-matter perishable. What is extinguished, to leave to "live."

The question is that we have chosen to compare parallelism, on the one hand: we exist in body-matter, on the other hand time is "unchangeable", which never changes, so we will never know the "secrets" that enclose this grandeur that it is time.

As for us subjected to the same "time" we stopped "here and there" (...) that are extinct our physical existences it, time will continue (...), inaccessible "and" immutable "and even with the "advantage" of "self-consuming" what is your "irreversibility".

So our discourse in expctativa can leave more of some considerations on our theme "irreversibility of time." Antonio Cardoso